Traditional wisdom suggests that a wicket-keeper is a player who keeps wickets. In fact apart from Les Ames in the 1930s, wicket-keepers in general hadn't really been great batsmen till the 1990s - certainly not to the extent where they could merit a place in their teams on their batting alone. Whilst that changed with the likes of Alec Stewart and Andy Flower in particular coming through, it was really the emergence of Adam Gilchrist that revolutionised the role of the wicket-keeper in the modern game. Rather than blaming Gilchrist for causing headaches by being "unnecessarily" good with the bat, cricketing countries have actually seeked to identify their own versions of the Aussie southpaw!
In the quest for the all-round keeper, what many people forget is Gilchrist is a splendid gloveman first and a fantastic batsman second. So much so that there has been a tendency to pick keepers on their batting ability. It is a delicate balance. Whom do you pick? A keeper who averages 20 with the bat but holds on to (almost) all his chances or one who can average an impressive 40 yet isn't competent enough with the gloves and is likely to miss (a few) chances along the way? The answer isn't really simple. You also have to consider that a keeper usually bats a 7 in contemporary test teams and one who bats better can potentially score very valuable runs in partnerships with one of the top six and with the tail.
On the contrary though, dropping a catch or missing a stumping can be costly especially if the beneficiary is the premier batsman in the opposition. Imagine dropping a catch of a Kallis or a Tendulkar and he goes on to add another hundred to his tally! What's more is such a lapse can cause momentum to shift and shoulders to drop in one's team and if a regular occurrence, it can dent the bowler's confidence in the keeper.
Its a hard one and perhaps comes down to the requirement of the individual team really. Some teams like New Zealand/South Africa have been lucky to have keepers like Boucher and McCullum who are good with the gloves as well as with the bat. India after trial and error have landed on Dhoni, whose glovework wasn't great at the start of his career, but his keeping graph would indicate an upward curve. Pakistan seem to be stuck with Akmal despite the fact that his keeping has been shocking for the past 2 years; apparently because he can bat!
England have been chopping and changing since Stewart hung his gloves up. The recent man in possession, Matt Prior, had an impressive start to his test career with the bat averaging over 40 which includes a similar average in the recently concluded test series in Sri Lanka. However in an astonishing turn of events, he has been left out from the squad for England's forthcoming tour of New Zealand. I bet Ryan Sidebottom won't be too despondent considering Prior's dropped 8 chances of him. Although surprising, I'd have to say the decision is a good one for it reinforces my personal opinion that regardless of how well a keeper can bat, his primary task is always with the gloves first!
Sunday, 6 January 2008
Sunday, 23 December 2007
England's Tour de Sri Lanka
For an England team, a tour of Sri Lanka rates amongst the very toughest. Although beating Australia in their backyard is the pinnacle challenge for all the teams of the cricketing world, the sluggish nature of the pitches in Sri Lanka combined with the extreme heat and humidity puts Sri Lanka right up there. Nasser Hussain certainly thinks so. Added to that is of course is the small matter of facing up against the Emerald Isle's very own spin wizard, Muttiah Muralitharan, who happens to have the small matter of 700-odd test wickets to his name.
It was always going to be a significant series for Murali, who was on the threshold for the most number of test wickets, set at 708 by his spin rival Shane Warne. In fact, Murali had 700 wickets when he landed in Australia but the Aussie batsmen ensured that he merely added 4 to his tally at a 100 runs apiece. It was a dent on a fabulous career record and the little magician was looking to get back to his old ways on hometurf as the English arrived. And so was the entire Sri Lankan team who were smarting from at 0-2 defeat Down Under despite Sangakkara's heroics in Hobart.
England, on the other hand, were due to arrive without their talismanic all-rounder Andrew Flintoff, who has been ruled out of cricket till summer 2008. However with a 3-2 ODI series win under their belt, England were quietly confident of their chances of making it a double with a test series win. Though the fact remains that Flintoff's absence leaves a gaping hole in the England test team, as they not only lose their best bowler but have the balance of the team compromised as Flintoff bats at 6.
In Flintoff's absence, the showdown for the 6th spot was between Middlesex's Owais Shah and the Essex lad Ravi Bopara. Shah, with an impressive debut in Mumbai and consistent performances in the domestic circuit for the past few years, meant that he had been the fringes of the test team for some time and seemed to be one to take the spot ahead of young Bopara. Though when the pre-Test tour game came along, it was Bopara who impressed with the bat and his brisk medium-pace and thus managed to get the nod for his test debut ahead of Shah. The move had it pros and cons but seemed to be a good one for Bopara's handiness with the ball meant England could contemplate going in with 2 seamers and 2 spinners or so it looked. Playing 2 spinners seemed to be the way to go in Sri Lanka considering that the move was part of England's formula during their triumph in the island in 2001. Also the 2nd spinner, Graeme Swann, had been the best spinner on view on either side during the preceding ODI series and is a handy lower-order batsman.
Therefore it was baffling that Swann wasn't in the starting line-up for the 1st Test. Admittedly, conditions in Kandy do favour the seamers for the first few mornings but spin plays its role as the match progresses. Nevertheless as Jayawardene won the toss and elected to bat, it was Hoggard who led England's early charge as Sri Lanka found themselves 42 for 5 on lunch on the first morning. Sangakkara's 92 saw Sri Lanka fight their way to 188 whilst Bell's fluent 83 gave England a positive start in reply. However, it was the hometown boy who then revved his magic and by the time Collingwood was dismissed, Murali stood proud as the world-record holder for the most test wickets; fittingly in front of his friends and family on his homeground. More crucially in the context of the match, England were bowled out for 281 with a lead of only 93.
Sri Lanka's reply was more assured the 2nd time around as Vandort and Jayasuriya, who was playing his valedictory test, set up a strong platform which Sangakkara capitalised on by making a world-record 4th successive 150+ score to show why exactly he is the number 1 ranked batsman in the world. The declaration took forever to come but when it did eventually at 442 for 8, England had been set an unlikely 350 to win the test with just a little over a day to go in the test. The Sri Lankan seamers, Vaas in particular in his 100th Test, induced a batting collapse to see England reduced to 139 for 6, with all hopes of salvaging a draw dwindling by the minute. Bell and Prior though had other ideas and put on 100-run partnership. Curiously Murali bowled 30 overs without a wicket on the 5th day pitch but all that changed when he critically took the new ball and removed Prior and Bell within a few balls of each other.
The Sri Lankan bowlers wrapped up the England innings to take the 1st test shortly before the close of play, cruelly denying England a draw, but a fair result nonetheless. The 2nd test in Colombo was a far less exciting affair. Even Murali conceded that the slowness of the pitch made it difficult for him to take wickets and he saw a draw as early as the 2nd day. Thus the result was a formality when the game ended with honours even 3 days later.
It was then time to move to Galle for the final test with Sri Lanka leading the series 1-0. It was fantastic occasion for the stadium as it hosted its first international match after being wrecked by the tsunami in 2004. England needed to win to have a share of the series whilst also hold on to the 2nd spot in the test rankings as anything but a win would have seen England drop down the table for the first time in 3 years! While a win for Sri Lanka would have seen them rise to 2nd place.
England had other worries too. Despite showing semblance of form, none of the batsman had managed to get a hundred. Similarly bowling-wise England had concerns as they hadn't been able to take 20 wickets in either of the tests. Graeme Swann's constant omission had started off as baffling but was now bordering on ludicrous. Given Matt Prior's good form with the bat, there were calls from some pundits to move him up a slot at number 6 to accommodate Swann at 7 since Swann can bat a fair bit and the move would allow England to play 5 bowlers, thus giving a better chance to secure 20 wickets which is a prerequisite to winning a test match. Although England would lose out on the added security on the batting front, the more aggressive option had to be the order of the day in what was a must-win game.
England, though, refused to be that adventurous and stuck to the 6 batsmen + 3 seamers + 1 spinner combination, one that would have been more viable in England but not in Sri Lanka. Not unless that spinner is a Warne or Murali anyway! The non-selection of a second spinner was shocking but with overhead conditions on the first morning suiting the seamers, Vaughan won the toss and promptly asked Jayawardene to bat. The English bowlers didn't optimise the new ball upfront but even when they recovered to put things right, they were badly let down by the fielders who dropped catches aplenty. The wicket-keeper topped the list as far as missed chances were concerned and although he finished the series with a batting average of 41, it scarcely makes up for the chances not taken. Meanwhile, as England displayed their incompetence, Mahela Jayawardene gave a masterclass in patience en route to his fourth test double-hundred.
With rain eating away precious time from the match, by the time Sri Lanka declared on 499 for 8, more than 2 days of the test had elapsed ending any hopes of England levelling the series. The Sri Lankan bowlers then pounced on a demoralised England who had toiled in the field for 2 days and dismissed them for an abysmal 81; England's lowest total in Asia. It merely confirmed Sri Lanka's utter domination in the series and while Cook's rearguard 118 ensured England didn't capitulate as badly the second time around, it was only showers from the heavens that denied Sri Lanka a 2-0 victory.
Some questionable selections along with shoddy cricket have seen England lose 0-1 and drop to a lowly 5th in the ICC Test Championship. There is a lot of work to be done if England are to be a formidable force in tests. Interestingly though the last time England toured Sri Lanka, it also ended in a 0-1 defeat but England came back stronger for it and it began a period where England won 11 out of the next 12 tests they played, followed by an away series win in South Africa and culminated with a memorable series win against Australia.
England tour New Zealand next and considering the Kiwis' test form, I see no reason why a turnaround in fortunes for England shouldn't be possible. Being the eternal optimist, I am just hoping that England come back stronger from this defeat in Sri Lanka just like they did 4 years ago and I hope it starts another golden era in England's test cricket.
It was always going to be a significant series for Murali, who was on the threshold for the most number of test wickets, set at 708 by his spin rival Shane Warne. In fact, Murali had 700 wickets when he landed in Australia but the Aussie batsmen ensured that he merely added 4 to his tally at a 100 runs apiece. It was a dent on a fabulous career record and the little magician was looking to get back to his old ways on hometurf as the English arrived. And so was the entire Sri Lankan team who were smarting from at 0-2 defeat Down Under despite Sangakkara's heroics in Hobart.
England, on the other hand, were due to arrive without their talismanic all-rounder Andrew Flintoff, who has been ruled out of cricket till summer 2008. However with a 3-2 ODI series win under their belt, England were quietly confident of their chances of making it a double with a test series win. Though the fact remains that Flintoff's absence leaves a gaping hole in the England test team, as they not only lose their best bowler but have the balance of the team compromised as Flintoff bats at 6.
In Flintoff's absence, the showdown for the 6th spot was between Middlesex's Owais Shah and the Essex lad Ravi Bopara. Shah, with an impressive debut in Mumbai and consistent performances in the domestic circuit for the past few years, meant that he had been the fringes of the test team for some time and seemed to be one to take the spot ahead of young Bopara. Though when the pre-Test tour game came along, it was Bopara who impressed with the bat and his brisk medium-pace and thus managed to get the nod for his test debut ahead of Shah. The move had it pros and cons but seemed to be a good one for Bopara's handiness with the ball meant England could contemplate going in with 2 seamers and 2 spinners or so it looked. Playing 2 spinners seemed to be the way to go in Sri Lanka considering that the move was part of England's formula during their triumph in the island in 2001. Also the 2nd spinner, Graeme Swann, had been the best spinner on view on either side during the preceding ODI series and is a handy lower-order batsman.
Therefore it was baffling that Swann wasn't in the starting line-up for the 1st Test. Admittedly, conditions in Kandy do favour the seamers for the first few mornings but spin plays its role as the match progresses. Nevertheless as Jayawardene won the toss and elected to bat, it was Hoggard who led England's early charge as Sri Lanka found themselves 42 for 5 on lunch on the first morning. Sangakkara's 92 saw Sri Lanka fight their way to 188 whilst Bell's fluent 83 gave England a positive start in reply. However, it was the hometown boy who then revved his magic and by the time Collingwood was dismissed, Murali stood proud as the world-record holder for the most test wickets; fittingly in front of his friends and family on his homeground. More crucially in the context of the match, England were bowled out for 281 with a lead of only 93.
Sri Lanka's reply was more assured the 2nd time around as Vandort and Jayasuriya, who was playing his valedictory test, set up a strong platform which Sangakkara capitalised on by making a world-record 4th successive 150+ score to show why exactly he is the number 1 ranked batsman in the world. The declaration took forever to come but when it did eventually at 442 for 8, England had been set an unlikely 350 to win the test with just a little over a day to go in the test. The Sri Lankan seamers, Vaas in particular in his 100th Test, induced a batting collapse to see England reduced to 139 for 6, with all hopes of salvaging a draw dwindling by the minute. Bell and Prior though had other ideas and put on 100-run partnership. Curiously Murali bowled 30 overs without a wicket on the 5th day pitch but all that changed when he critically took the new ball and removed Prior and Bell within a few balls of each other.
The Sri Lankan bowlers wrapped up the England innings to take the 1st test shortly before the close of play, cruelly denying England a draw, but a fair result nonetheless. The 2nd test in Colombo was a far less exciting affair. Even Murali conceded that the slowness of the pitch made it difficult for him to take wickets and he saw a draw as early as the 2nd day. Thus the result was a formality when the game ended with honours even 3 days later.
It was then time to move to Galle for the final test with Sri Lanka leading the series 1-0. It was fantastic occasion for the stadium as it hosted its first international match after being wrecked by the tsunami in 2004. England needed to win to have a share of the series whilst also hold on to the 2nd spot in the test rankings as anything but a win would have seen England drop down the table for the first time in 3 years! While a win for Sri Lanka would have seen them rise to 2nd place.
England had other worries too. Despite showing semblance of form, none of the batsman had managed to get a hundred. Similarly bowling-wise England had concerns as they hadn't been able to take 20 wickets in either of the tests. Graeme Swann's constant omission had started off as baffling but was now bordering on ludicrous. Given Matt Prior's good form with the bat, there were calls from some pundits to move him up a slot at number 6 to accommodate Swann at 7 since Swann can bat a fair bit and the move would allow England to play 5 bowlers, thus giving a better chance to secure 20 wickets which is a prerequisite to winning a test match. Although England would lose out on the added security on the batting front, the more aggressive option had to be the order of the day in what was a must-win game.
England, though, refused to be that adventurous and stuck to the 6 batsmen + 3 seamers + 1 spinner combination, one that would have been more viable in England but not in Sri Lanka. Not unless that spinner is a Warne or Murali anyway! The non-selection of a second spinner was shocking but with overhead conditions on the first morning suiting the seamers, Vaughan won the toss and promptly asked Jayawardene to bat. The English bowlers didn't optimise the new ball upfront but even when they recovered to put things right, they were badly let down by the fielders who dropped catches aplenty. The wicket-keeper topped the list as far as missed chances were concerned and although he finished the series with a batting average of 41, it scarcely makes up for the chances not taken. Meanwhile, as England displayed their incompetence, Mahela Jayawardene gave a masterclass in patience en route to his fourth test double-hundred.
With rain eating away precious time from the match, by the time Sri Lanka declared on 499 for 8, more than 2 days of the test had elapsed ending any hopes of England levelling the series. The Sri Lankan bowlers then pounced on a demoralised England who had toiled in the field for 2 days and dismissed them for an abysmal 81; England's lowest total in Asia. It merely confirmed Sri Lanka's utter domination in the series and while Cook's rearguard 118 ensured England didn't capitulate as badly the second time around, it was only showers from the heavens that denied Sri Lanka a 2-0 victory.
Some questionable selections along with shoddy cricket have seen England lose 0-1 and drop to a lowly 5th in the ICC Test Championship. There is a lot of work to be done if England are to be a formidable force in tests. Interestingly though the last time England toured Sri Lanka, it also ended in a 0-1 defeat but England came back stronger for it and it began a period where England won 11 out of the next 12 tests they played, followed by an away series win in South Africa and culminated with a memorable series win against Australia.
England tour New Zealand next and considering the Kiwis' test form, I see no reason why a turnaround in fortunes for England shouldn't be possible. Being the eternal optimist, I am just hoping that England come back stronger from this defeat in Sri Lanka just like they did 4 years ago and I hope it starts another golden era in England's test cricket.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
